Brilliant Blue
Decode Label flags Brilliant Blue as a low concern in food and drink (artificial additive). It appears in 14 of the 893 published products we have analysed (1.6%).
The concern
Synthetic blue dye — banned in several countries
E133 is a synthetic triarylmethane dye. It is banned or restricted in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Switzerland, and Sweden. May cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. No strong carcinogenic evidence, but the precautionary principle applies.
Most relevant to
How common it is in this catalogue
Measured across every product Decode Label has analysed — not estimated, and not taken from anyone else's dataset.
By category
Hazard classification
EFSA's re-evaluation lowered the acceptable daily intake; refined (Tier 3) exposure estimates fall below the new ADI, but less-refined (Tier 2) estimates exceed it for children at the 95th percentile of consumption.
Identity
- Canonical name
- Brilliant Blue FCF
- CAS number
- 3844-45-9
- E number
- E133
- INS number
- 133
Also appears on labels as
Questions
Is Brilliant Blue safe?
EU: EFSA re-evaluation (2010) — ADI reduced from 10 to 6 mg/kg bw/day. Why it is flagged: Synthetic blue dye — banned in several countries. Decode Label treats it as a low concern in food and drink. It appears in 14 of the 893 published products we have analysed (1.6%).
How common is Brilliant Blue in Indian packaged products?
Decode Label found Brilliant Blue in 14 of 893 published products (1.6%), most often in Haircare, Food, Bath & Body.
Which authorities have classified Brilliant Blue?
EU — EFSA re-evaluation (2010) — ADI reduced from 10 to 6 mg/kg bw/day.
Who should be most careful with Brilliant Blue?
People prone to allergies; Children.
Products containing Brilliant Blue
14 published products, each with its own full analysis.
Related ingredients
Other entries in the register with the same kind of concern.
Method and limits
- Prevalence counts published products whose decoded ingredient list matches this substance or one of its label synonyms, using the same matching the score itself uses. It describes our catalogue of 893 products, not the Indian market as a whole.
- Presence is not dose. An ingredient list gives order, not quantity, unless the pack declares a percentage. Nothing here estimates how much of this substance any product contains.
- A classification is not a verdict on a product. An agency classifies a substance under defined conditions of exposure; whether that matters in a given food or cosmetic depends on route, concentration and use.
- No regulatory rows. This substance is not matched in our regulatory warehouse, so the concern above rests on the cited authority alone.
- Last updated. This register entry was last changed on 28 September 2026.
- Corrections. Every figure here is reproducible from the sources named. If something is wrong, tell us and we will correct it and say what changed.